ChangeEd logo
๐Ÿ“Š Project Preferences ยท June 2026

Project preferences for the next conversation

A summary of the project preference rankings submitted by both ChangeEd groups, highlighting the ideas that surfaced most strongly and inviting participants into the next stage of open collaborative discussion.

9 Total participant responses analyzed across both groups.
16 Project ideas ranked by participants.
8โ†’1 Scoring method: 8 points for 1st choice down to 1 point for 8th.
6 Projects surfaced for deeper discussion.
โœจ At a glance

Overall reading of the results

The two groups point toward complementary priorities: future-ready human learning, educator agency, authentic AI pathways, student power, courageous leadership, and more meaningful assessment.

๐Ÿงญ

Group 1 favored future-readiness

The strongest signal was around rethinking curriculum, educator roles, and real-world AI pathways.

๐ŸŽ™๏ธ

Group 2 favored agency and leadership

The strongest discussion signals focused on student power, courageous leadership, and escaping narrow assessment models.

๐ŸŒ

A shared human-centered thread

Across both groups, the strongest ideas ask how education can become more humane, participatory, and transformative.

Group 1

Top project directions

Based on 5 participant responses. One duplicate entry was handled by counting only the first occurrence and ignoring the repeated lower-ranked choice.

๐Ÿ’ฌ First discussion focus: The Future Human Curriculum

The Future Human Curriculum

1
34 points 2 first-place votes 5 top-3 votes

A curriculum redesign project centered on the human capacities that become more essential in an AI-saturated world: judgment, creativity, ethical reasoning, emotional intelligence, collaboration, care, and meaning-making.

  • Could produce a practical framework for schools.
  • Strongest shared signal in Group 1.
  • Placed in the top three by every respondent.

Educators as Evolutionary Agents

2
26 points 1 first-place vote 3 top-3 votes

A professional learning and leadership project that positions educators not only as implementers of change, but as active agents in the evolution of learning, culture, and institutional purpose.

  • Connects teacher identity with transformation.
  • Could become a facilitation toolkit or cohort model.
  • Complements the curriculum redesign theme.

Real-World AI Pathways

3
25 points 2 first-place votes 2 top-3 votes

A project that connects students and schools with authentic AI use cases, emerging careers, community challenges, and project-based learning pathways grounded in real social and technological change.

  • Strong first-choice support despite one omitted ranking.
  • Practical bridge between school and the world beyond school.
  • Included among the three discussion priorities because of its first-choice support.
Rank Project Score 1st-place votes Top-3 votes
1 The Future Human Curriculum
34
2 5
2 Educators as Evolutionary Agents
26
1 3
3 Real-World AI Pathways
25
2 2
4 AI Without Cognitive Offloading
25
0 2
5 Education Without Borders
19
0 1
6 The 1% Better School
18
0 2
7 Student as Curriculum
16
0 0
8 Productive Screen Time & Human Wellbeing
14
0 0
Data note: AI Without Cognitive Offloading tied with Real-World AI Pathways on total score. Real-World AI Pathways is included among the three highlighted discussion priorities because it received two first-place votes, while AI Without Cognitive Offloading received none.
Group 2

Top project directions

Based on 4 participant responses. All submitted rankings were complete and clean, with no duplicate project selections.

๐Ÿ’ฌ First discussion focus: From Student Voice to Student Power

From Student Voice to Student Power

1
26 points 2 first-place votes 3 top-3 votes

A project that moves beyond listening to students and toward shared agency, co-design, and meaningful student participation in learning, school culture, improvement processes, and decision-making.

  • Strongest initial signal in Group 2.
  • Strong potential for student-led prototypes.
  • Connects voice, agency, governance, and belonging.

Courageous Leadership for Educational Transformation

2
25 points 0 first-place votes 3 top-3 votes

A leadership project focused on the mindsets, practices, conversations, and decisions required to transform schools with courage, clarity, humility, and community trust.

  • Received nearly the same level of support as the first-ranked idea.
  • Broad top-three support across the group.
  • Could become a leadership framework or workshop series.

The Assessment Trap

3
23 points 0 first-place votes 2 top-3 votes

A project that challenges narrow assessment habits and explores more authentic ways to document learning, growth, competencies, contribution, creativity, and student development.

  • Strong fit with transformation and student agency.
  • Could generate tools, rubrics, and school case studies.
  • Names a common obstacle to deeper learning reform.
Rank Project Score 1st-place votes Top-3 votes
1 From Student Voice to Student Power
26
2 3
2 Courageous Leadership for Educational Transformation
25
0 3
3 The Assessment Trap
23
0 2
4 The Adolescent Engagement Lab
18
1 1
5 Learning Beyond the Classroom
14
0 1
5 The AI Mosaic
14
0 1
7 Collective Illusions in Education
13
1 1
8 Global Map of Living Alternatives
11
0 0

Next Steps

The rankings are not final decisions. They are starting points for the next conversation. Groups will now meet to freely discuss ideas around its three highlighted projects, exploring what feels most meaningful, what might be combined, and what new possibilities emerge from the conversation. Together, these six project directions open a rich ChangeEd conversation around human-centered educational transformation.

๐Ÿง  Future human capacities ๐Ÿ‘ฉโ€๐Ÿซ Educator agency ๐Ÿค– Real-world AI ๐ŸŽ™๏ธ Student power ๐Ÿ”ฅ Courageous leadership ๐Ÿงพ Assessment reform